Recording Statement of Responsibility : LC-PCC Best Practices Guidelines

-
Myth:
“You must always record the statement of responsibility exactly as it appears, including all degrees, titles, and affiliations.”

Reality:

Generally, yes -- and this is the preferred practice for monographs.  But not necessarily.  LC-PCC PS 2.4.1.4 says to “generally” not abridge a statement of responsibility.  But if the statement of responsibility contains a burdensome amount of such information, you may abridge it, provided no essential information is lost.

[Source : Library of Congress]


See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Comments

Post a Comment

RDA Blog is DISCONTINUED

RDA Blog is discontinued. Visit below link for updated information on RDA:

Resource Description and Access (RDA)


Popular posts from this blog

Date of Publication Distribution Copyright in RDA & MARC 21 Field 264 Examples

-
Image
Date of Publication, Distribution, and Copyright in Resource Description and Access (RDA) Cataloging Rules  & MARC 264 Examples Table of Contents: Core Element How Date of Publication is defined Where the Rules are for Date of Publication in RDA What are the Sources of Information for Date of Publication in RDA How is Date of Publication Transcribed / Recorded in Resource Description and Access (RDA) Dates of the Non-Gregorian or Julian Calendar; Dates in the Form of Chronogram RDA Examples What to do if the date on the resource is incorrect Multipart Monographs, Serials, and Integrating Resources Date of Publication not Identified in a Single-Part Resource RDA Cataloging Examples of Dates Supplying Dates (Date of Publication Not Identified in the Resource) Importance of Supplying Probable Place and Date of Publication Examples of Supplying Publication Data Other RDA Examples of Dates Date of Distribution Where the Rules are for Date of Distribution in RDA
Read more

RDA -- INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND AND HISTORY

-
Resource Description and Access ( RDA ) is a standard for cataloguing that provides instructions and guidelines on formulating data for resource description and discovery. Intended for use by libraries and other cultural organizations such as museums and archives, RDA is the successor to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2), the current cataloging standard set for English language libraries. RDA was initially released in June 2010. In March 2012, the Library of Congress announced it will have fully implemented RDA cataloging by March 31, 2013. Several other national libraries including the British Library, Library and Archives Canada, National Library of Australia, and Deutsche Nationalbibliothek also planned to implement RDA in 2013. Background RDA emerged from the International Conference on the Principles & Future Development of AACR held in Toronto in 1997. It was quickly realised that substantial revision of AACR2 was required, which
Read more

Title and Statement of Responsibility in RDA with MARC 21 Examples

-
Image
Contents: Title Proper         Title Proper Transcription Parallel Title Proper Other Title Information Variant Titles Earlier Title Proper and Later Title Proper Statement of Responsibility        “Rule of Three” -- Change from AACR2!           More Than One Statement of Responsibility <<<<<---------->>>>> Title Proper Ø          Title proper is a CORE ELEMENT Title proper is the chief name of a resource.  It is the focus for identifying the preferred source of information.  An alternative title is treated as part of the title proper.  The title proper excludes any parallel titles proper, other title information, and parallel other title information.  This data is recorded in MARC field 245 $a $n $p P          Look at instruction 2.3.2 Sources :           If the information does not appear on a source forming part of the resource itself, take it from one of the following sources (in order of preference
Read more